261 lines
6.8 KiB
JavaScript
261 lines
6.8 KiB
JavaScript
/**
|
|
* @fileoverview Rule to flag fall-through cases in switch statements.
|
|
* @author Matt DuVall <http://mattduvall.com/>
|
|
*/
|
|
"use strict";
|
|
|
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Requirements
|
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
const { directivesPattern } = require("../shared/directives");
|
|
|
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Helpers
|
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
const DEFAULT_FALLTHROUGH_COMMENT = /falls?\s?through/iu;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Checks all segments in a set and returns true if any are reachable.
|
|
* @param {Set<CodePathSegment>} segments The segments to check.
|
|
* @returns {boolean} True if any segment is reachable; false otherwise.
|
|
*/
|
|
function isAnySegmentReachable(segments) {
|
|
for (const segment of segments) {
|
|
if (segment.reachable) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Checks whether or not a given comment string is really a fallthrough comment and not an ESLint directive.
|
|
* @param {string} comment The comment string to check.
|
|
* @param {RegExp} fallthroughCommentPattern The regular expression used for checking for fallthrough comments.
|
|
* @returns {boolean} `true` if the comment string is truly a fallthrough comment.
|
|
*/
|
|
function isFallThroughComment(comment, fallthroughCommentPattern) {
|
|
return (
|
|
fallthroughCommentPattern.test(comment) &&
|
|
!directivesPattern.test(comment.trim())
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Checks whether or not a given case has a fallthrough comment.
|
|
* @param {ASTNode} caseWhichFallsThrough SwitchCase node which falls through.
|
|
* @param {ASTNode} subsequentCase The case after caseWhichFallsThrough.
|
|
* @param {RuleContext} context A rule context which stores comments.
|
|
* @param {RegExp} fallthroughCommentPattern A pattern to match comment to.
|
|
* @returns {null | object} the comment if the case has a valid fallthrough comment, otherwise null
|
|
*/
|
|
function getFallthroughComment(
|
|
caseWhichFallsThrough,
|
|
subsequentCase,
|
|
context,
|
|
fallthroughCommentPattern,
|
|
) {
|
|
const sourceCode = context.sourceCode;
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
caseWhichFallsThrough.consequent.length === 1 &&
|
|
caseWhichFallsThrough.consequent[0].type === "BlockStatement"
|
|
) {
|
|
const trailingCloseBrace = sourceCode.getLastToken(
|
|
caseWhichFallsThrough.consequent[0],
|
|
);
|
|
const commentInBlock = sourceCode
|
|
.getCommentsBefore(trailingCloseBrace)
|
|
.pop();
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
commentInBlock &&
|
|
isFallThroughComment(
|
|
commentInBlock.value,
|
|
fallthroughCommentPattern,
|
|
)
|
|
) {
|
|
return commentInBlock;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const comment = sourceCode.getCommentsBefore(subsequentCase).pop();
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
comment &&
|
|
isFallThroughComment(comment.value, fallthroughCommentPattern)
|
|
) {
|
|
return comment;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Checks whether a node and a token are separated by blank lines
|
|
* @param {ASTNode} node The node to check
|
|
* @param {Token} token The token to compare against
|
|
* @returns {boolean} `true` if there are blank lines between node and token
|
|
*/
|
|
function hasBlankLinesBetween(node, token) {
|
|
return token.loc.start.line > node.loc.end.line + 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule Definition
|
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
/** @type {import('../types').Rule.RuleModule} */
|
|
module.exports = {
|
|
meta: {
|
|
type: "problem",
|
|
|
|
defaultOptions: [
|
|
{
|
|
allowEmptyCase: false,
|
|
reportUnusedFallthroughComment: false,
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
docs: {
|
|
description: "Disallow fallthrough of `case` statements",
|
|
recommended: true,
|
|
url: "https://eslint.org/docs/latest/rules/no-fallthrough",
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
schema: [
|
|
{
|
|
type: "object",
|
|
properties: {
|
|
commentPattern: {
|
|
type: "string",
|
|
},
|
|
allowEmptyCase: {
|
|
type: "boolean",
|
|
},
|
|
reportUnusedFallthroughComment: {
|
|
type: "boolean",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
additionalProperties: false,
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
messages: {
|
|
unusedFallthroughComment:
|
|
"Found a comment that would permit fallthrough, but case cannot fall through.",
|
|
case: "Expected a 'break' statement before 'case'.",
|
|
default: "Expected a 'break' statement before 'default'.",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
create(context) {
|
|
const codePathSegments = [];
|
|
let currentCodePathSegments = new Set();
|
|
const sourceCode = context.sourceCode;
|
|
const [
|
|
{ allowEmptyCase, commentPattern, reportUnusedFallthroughComment },
|
|
] = context.options;
|
|
const fallthroughCommentPattern = commentPattern
|
|
? new RegExp(commentPattern, "u")
|
|
: DEFAULT_FALLTHROUGH_COMMENT;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We need to use leading comments of the next SwitchCase node because
|
|
* trailing comments is wrong if semicolons are omitted.
|
|
*/
|
|
let previousCase = null;
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
onCodePathStart() {
|
|
codePathSegments.push(currentCodePathSegments);
|
|
currentCodePathSegments = new Set();
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
onCodePathEnd() {
|
|
currentCodePathSegments = codePathSegments.pop();
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
onUnreachableCodePathSegmentStart(segment) {
|
|
currentCodePathSegments.add(segment);
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
onUnreachableCodePathSegmentEnd(segment) {
|
|
currentCodePathSegments.delete(segment);
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
onCodePathSegmentStart(segment) {
|
|
currentCodePathSegments.add(segment);
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
onCodePathSegmentEnd(segment) {
|
|
currentCodePathSegments.delete(segment);
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
SwitchCase(node) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* Checks whether or not there is a fallthrough comment.
|
|
* And reports the previous fallthrough node if that does not exist.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (previousCase && previousCase.node.parent === node.parent) {
|
|
const previousCaseFallthroughComment =
|
|
getFallthroughComment(
|
|
previousCase.node,
|
|
node,
|
|
context,
|
|
fallthroughCommentPattern,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
previousCase.isFallthrough &&
|
|
!previousCaseFallthroughComment
|
|
) {
|
|
context.report({
|
|
messageId: node.test ? "case" : "default",
|
|
node,
|
|
});
|
|
} else if (
|
|
reportUnusedFallthroughComment &&
|
|
!previousCase.isSwitchExitReachable &&
|
|
previousCaseFallthroughComment
|
|
) {
|
|
context.report({
|
|
messageId: "unusedFallthroughComment",
|
|
node: previousCaseFallthroughComment,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
previousCase = null;
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
"SwitchCase:exit"(node) {
|
|
const nextToken = sourceCode.getTokenAfter(node);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* `reachable` meant fall through because statements preceded by
|
|
* `break`, `return`, or `throw` are unreachable.
|
|
* And allows empty cases and the last case.
|
|
*/
|
|
const isSwitchExitReachable = isAnySegmentReachable(
|
|
currentCodePathSegments,
|
|
);
|
|
const isFallthrough =
|
|
isSwitchExitReachable &&
|
|
(node.consequent.length > 0 ||
|
|
(!allowEmptyCase &&
|
|
hasBlankLinesBetween(node, nextToken))) &&
|
|
node.parent.cases.at(-1) !== node;
|
|
|
|
previousCase = {
|
|
node,
|
|
isSwitchExitReachable,
|
|
isFallthrough,
|
|
};
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
},
|
|
};
|