GSL/include/gsl/pointers

324 lines
9.8 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
// Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
//
// This code is licensed under the MIT License (MIT).
//
// THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
// IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
// FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
// AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
// LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
// OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
// THE SOFTWARE.
//
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
#ifndef GSL_POINTERS_H
#define GSL_POINTERS_H
#include "assert" // for Ensures, Expects
#include <algorithm> // for forward
#include <cstddef> // for ptrdiff_t, nullptr_t, size_t
#include <memory> // for shared_ptr, unique_ptr
#include <system_error> // for hash
#include <type_traits> // for enable_if_t, is_convertible, is_assignable
#if !defined(GSL_NO_IOSTREAMS)
#include <iosfwd> // for ostream
#endif // !defined(GSL_NO_IOSTREAMS)
namespace gsl
{
namespace details
{
template <typename T, typename = void>
struct is_comparable_to_nullptr : std::false_type
{
};
template <typename T>
struct is_comparable_to_nullptr<
T,
std::enable_if_t<std::is_convertible<decltype(std::declval<T>() != nullptr), bool>::value>>
: std::true_type
{
};
} // namespace details
//
// GSL.owner: ownership pointers
//
using std::shared_ptr;
using std::unique_ptr;
//
// owner
//
// owner<T> is designed as a bridge for code that must deal directly with owning pointers for some
// reason
//
// T must be a pointer type
// - disallow construction from any type other than pointer type
//
template <class T, class = std::enable_if_t<std::is_pointer<T>::value>>
using owner = T;
//
// not_null
//
// Restricts a pointer or smart pointer to only hold non-null values.
//
// Has zero size overhead over T.
//
// If T is a pointer (i.e. T == U*) then
// - allow construction from U*
// - disallow construction from nullptr_t
// - disallow default construction
// - ensure construction from null U* fails
// - allow implicit conversion to U*
//
template <class T>
class not_null
{
public:
static_assert(details::is_comparable_to_nullptr<T>::value, "T cannot be compared to nullptr.");
template <typename U, typename = std::enable_if_t<std::is_convertible<U, T>::value>>
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
constexpr not_null(U&& u) : ptr_(std::forward<U>(u))
{
Expects(ptr_ != nullptr);
}
template <typename = std::enable_if_t<!std::is_same<std::nullptr_t, T>::value>>
constexpr not_null(T u) : ptr_(std::move(u))
{
Expects(ptr_ != nullptr);
}
template <typename U, typename = std::enable_if_t<std::is_convertible<U, T>::value>>
constexpr not_null(const not_null<U>& other) : not_null(other.get())
{}
not_null(const not_null& other) = default;
not_null& operator=(const not_null& other) = default;
constexpr std::conditional_t<std::is_copy_constructible<T>::value, T, const T&> get() const
{
Ensures(ptr_ != nullptr);
return ptr_;
}
constexpr operator T() const { return get(); }
constexpr decltype(auto) operator->() const { return get(); }
2019-11-15 15:11:44 -05:00
constexpr decltype(auto) operator*() const { return *get(); }
// prevents compilation when someone attempts to assign a null pointer constant
not_null(std::nullptr_t) = delete;
not_null& operator=(std::nullptr_t) = delete;
// unwanted operators...pointers only point to single objects!
not_null& operator++() = delete;
not_null& operator--() = delete;
not_null operator++(int) = delete;
not_null operator--(int) = delete;
not_null& operator+=(std::ptrdiff_t) = delete;
not_null& operator-=(std::ptrdiff_t) = delete;
void operator[](std::ptrdiff_t) const = delete;
private:
T ptr_;
};
template <class T>
auto make_not_null(T&& t) noexcept
{
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
return not_null<std::remove_cv_t<std::remove_reference_t<T>>>{std::forward<T>(t)};
}
#if !defined(GSL_NO_IOSTREAMS)
template <class T>
std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, const not_null<T>& val)
{
os << val.get();
return os;
}
#endif // !defined(GSL_NO_IOSTREAMS)
template <class T, class U>
auto operator==(const not_null<T>& lhs,
const not_null<U>& rhs) noexcept(noexcept(lhs.get() == rhs.get()))
-> decltype(lhs.get() == rhs.get())
{
return lhs.get() == rhs.get();
}
template <class T, class U>
auto operator!=(const not_null<T>& lhs,
const not_null<U>& rhs) noexcept(noexcept(lhs.get() != rhs.get()))
-> decltype(lhs.get() != rhs.get())
{
return lhs.get() != rhs.get();
}
template <class T, class U>
auto operator<(const not_null<T>& lhs,
const not_null<U>& rhs) noexcept(noexcept(lhs.get() < rhs.get()))
-> decltype(lhs.get() < rhs.get())
{
return lhs.get() < rhs.get();
}
template <class T, class U>
auto operator<=(const not_null<T>& lhs,
const not_null<U>& rhs) noexcept(noexcept(lhs.get() <= rhs.get()))
-> decltype(lhs.get() <= rhs.get())
{
return lhs.get() <= rhs.get();
}
template <class T, class U>
auto operator>(const not_null<T>& lhs,
const not_null<U>& rhs) noexcept(noexcept(lhs.get() > rhs.get()))
-> decltype(lhs.get() > rhs.get())
{
return lhs.get() > rhs.get();
}
template <class T, class U>
auto operator>=(const not_null<T>& lhs,
const not_null<U>& rhs) noexcept(noexcept(lhs.get() >= rhs.get()))
-> decltype(lhs.get() >= rhs.get())
{
return lhs.get() >= rhs.get();
}
// more unwanted operators
template <class T, class U>
std::ptrdiff_t operator-(const not_null<T>&, const not_null<U>&) = delete;
template <class T>
not_null<T> operator-(const not_null<T>&, std::ptrdiff_t) = delete;
template <class T>
not_null<T> operator+(const not_null<T>&, std::ptrdiff_t) = delete;
template <class T>
not_null<T> operator+(std::ptrdiff_t, const not_null<T>&) = delete;
} // namespace gsl
namespace std
{
template <class T>
struct hash<gsl::not_null<T>>
{
2020-08-13 07:55:17 -04:00
std::size_t operator()(const gsl::not_null<T>& value) const { return hash<T>{}(value.get()); }
};
} // namespace std
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
namespace gsl
{
//
// strict_not_null
//
// Restricts a pointer or smart pointer to only hold non-null values,
//
2019-10-06 12:20:15 -04:00
// - provides a strict (i.e. explicit constructor from T) wrapper of not_null
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
// - to be used for new code that wishes the design to be cleaner and make not_null
// checks intentional, or in old code that would like to make the transition.
//
// To make the transition from not_null, incrementally replace not_null
// by strict_not_null and fix compilation errors
//
// Expect to
2019-10-06 12:20:15 -04:00
// - remove all unneeded conversions from raw pointer to not_null and back
// - make API clear by specifying not_null in parameters where needed
// - remove unnecessary asserts
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
//
template <class T>
class strict_not_null : public not_null<T>
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
{
public:
template <typename U, typename = std::enable_if_t<std::is_convertible<U, T>::value>>
constexpr explicit strict_not_null(U&& u) : not_null<T>(std::forward<U>(u))
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
{}
template <typename = std::enable_if_t<!std::is_same<std::nullptr_t, T>::value>>
constexpr explicit strict_not_null(T u) : not_null<T>(u)
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
{}
template <typename U, typename = std::enable_if_t<std::is_convertible<U, T>::value>>
constexpr strict_not_null(const not_null<U>& other) : not_null<T>(other)
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
{}
template <typename U, typename = std::enable_if_t<std::is_convertible<U, T>::value>>
constexpr strict_not_null(const strict_not_null<U>& other) : not_null<T>(other)
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
{}
strict_not_null(strict_not_null&& other) = default;
strict_not_null(const strict_not_null& other) = default;
strict_not_null& operator=(const strict_not_null& other) = default;
strict_not_null& operator=(const not_null<T>& other)
{
not_null<T>::operator=(other);
return *this;
}
// prevents compilation when someone attempts to assign a null pointer constant
strict_not_null(std::nullptr_t) = delete;
strict_not_null& operator=(std::nullptr_t) = delete;
// unwanted operators...pointers only point to single objects!
strict_not_null& operator++() = delete;
strict_not_null& operator--() = delete;
strict_not_null operator++(int) = delete;
strict_not_null operator--(int) = delete;
strict_not_null& operator+=(std::ptrdiff_t) = delete;
strict_not_null& operator-=(std::ptrdiff_t) = delete;
void operator[](std::ptrdiff_t) const = delete;
};
// more unwanted operators
template <class T, class U>
std::ptrdiff_t operator-(const strict_not_null<T>&, const strict_not_null<U>&) = delete;
template <class T>
strict_not_null<T> operator-(const strict_not_null<T>&, std::ptrdiff_t) = delete;
template <class T>
strict_not_null<T> operator+(const strict_not_null<T>&, std::ptrdiff_t) = delete;
template <class T>
strict_not_null<T> operator+(std::ptrdiff_t, const strict_not_null<T>&) = delete;
template <class T>
auto make_strict_not_null(T&& t) noexcept
{
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
return strict_not_null<std::remove_cv_t<std::remove_reference_t<T>>>{std::forward<T>(t)};
}
#if (defined(__cpp_deduction_guides) && (__cpp_deduction_guides >= 201611L))
// deduction guides to prevent the ctad-maybe-unsupported warning
template <class T>
not_null(T) -> not_null<T>;
template <class T>
strict_not_null(T) -> strict_not_null<T>;
#endif // ( defined(__cpp_deduction_guides) && (__cpp_deduction_guides >= 201611L) )
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
} // namespace gsl
namespace std
{
template <class T>
struct hash<gsl::strict_not_null<T>>
{
std::size_t operator()(const gsl::strict_not_null<T>& value) const
{
return hash<T>{}(value.get());
}
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
};
} // namespace std
Clang cl (#762) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Fix #739 correct cppcorecheck warnings for clang-cl * Add clang-cl configurations * Corrections Appveyor; Temporarily disable msvc compilation for faster testing (#741) * Add path to clang-cl.exe (#741) * Escape backslash in path (#741) * Update vcpkg (#741) * Check vcpkg version; try without building vcpkg; use latest clang-cl from path (#741) * Fix blocks in ps script (#741) * Try accessing APPVEYOR_BUILD_FOLDER variable (#471) * Update span size() bug confirmation test for GCC 6.5 (#741) * MSVC flags to Clang-cl; disable c++98-compat and undefined macro warnings (#741) * Suppress clang warning on tests (missing-prototypes) (#741) * Fix clang warning -Wnewline-eof (#741) * Fix clang warning -Wdouble-promotion (#741) * Set linker explicitly * Clean condition statement * For Clang, fallback to the AppVeyor installed version of CMake * Fix clang warning -Wmissing-variable-declarations * Fallback to the MSVC linker until vcpkg has been updated * Revert "Fallback to the MSVC linker until vcpkg has been updated" This reverts commit 7263f3289e6e835c32fc7800d0c2d4e58bd21178. * Fix clang warning -Wunused-member-function * Fix clang warning -Wmissing-noreturn * Fix clang warning -Winvalid-noreturn on Windows * Add macro block end comment on large #if blocks * Workaround: fallback to mscv link.exe * Workaround: get msvc paths into PowerShell through intermediate file * Workaround: fix, remove "PATH=" from text * Workaround: try with full-path; and return user PATH * Workaround: fix, escape backslashes * Revert all since "Workaround: fallback to mscv link.exe" did not work on AppVeyor This reverts the commits: bda3d6a428e5d19e97375b2e575b0f51ff1b4bc0 97062933acfb6428535c0fdcab5d94371ce72bfc 0f4fb04bac9c2d091005b791294237250dbe0668 1b0c19afd154f4ffc5ef793014c1bc2324534fd0 a5739ea5f0cd7633527b5e5d3b16a9e3ade7149f * Suppress output of git pull; remove vcpkg from cache * Re-enable AppVeyor builds for all platforms * Correct typo Co-Authored-By: Farwaykorse <Farwaykorse@users.noreply.github.com> * Add Clang-cl 7.0.0 to the supported platforms * Revert "Fix clang warning -Wunused-member-function" This reverts commit 6fe1a4203501145ab4350b9152ecc11f3a30e49a. * Fix or locally suppress clang warning -Wunused-member-function * format touched code and correct comment * git pull --quiet * fix logic error in workaround * fix missing bracket * Suppress output of mkdir * Replace MSBuild with Ninja * Suppress output of 7z * Add architecture flags for Clang * Drop workaround for lld-link * 7-zip Overwrite and Alternative output suppression without suppressing errors Replaces 3c1c0794dd9a29908cc7c38f591bd3c7b4929677 * AppVeyor setup and CMake before build * reorder compiler configuration * remove unnecessary * remove -fno-strict-aliasing * remove -Wsign-conversion, since before v4.0 part of -Wconversion * -Wctor-dtor-privacy is GCC only * remove -Woverloaded-virtual part of -Wmost, part of -Wall * add -Wmissing-noreturn * remove the pragmas for -Wunused-member-function * Re-add MSBuild generator on AppVeyor * Print CMake commands * Add MSBuild toolset selection * Separate Architecture setting * clang-cl: add -Weverything * clang-cl -Wno-c++98-compat * clang-cl -Wno-c++98-compat-pedantic * clang-cl -Wno-missing-prototypes * clang-cl C++14 -Wno-unused-member-function * clang-cl -Wundef __GNUC__ * clang++: add -Weverything * clang++ -Wno-c++98-compat * clang++ -Wno-c++98-compat-pedantic * clang++ -Wno-missing-prototypes * clang++ -Wno-weak-vtables * clang++ C++14 -Wno-unused-member-function * clang++ fix -Wundef _MSC_VER * clang++ -Wno-padded * clang++ solve -Wdeprecated * Add AppleClang compiler target Since CMake v3.0 use of Clang for both is deprecated * clang++ v5.0 C++17 -Wno-undefined-func-template * Add VS2015 + LLVM/clang-cl to AppVeyor * Do not disable constexpr when compiling with clang-cl on Windows * Clean-up clang-only warnings (now under -Weverything) * Revert "Fix clang warning -Winvalid-noreturn on Windows" This reverts commit 2238c4760e86feebb2a18620b77312bd01055f61. * Suppress -Winvalid-noreturn for the MS STL noexception workaround * CMake: put preprocessor definition in target_compile_definitions * Solve compiler warning C4668: __GNUC__ not defined
2019-01-15 13:27:34 -05:00
#endif // GSL_POINTERS_H