GSL/tests/notnull_tests.cpp

551 lines
16 KiB
C++
Raw Permalink Normal View History

2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
// Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
//
// This code is licensed under the MIT License (MIT).
//
// THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
// IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
// FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
// AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
// LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
// OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
// THE SOFTWARE.
//
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
2019-12-03 17:32:25 -05:00
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
#include <gsl/pointers> // for not_null, operator<, operator<=, operator>
#include <algorithm> // for addressof
#include <memory> // for shared_ptr, make_shared, operator<, opera...
#include <sstream> // for operator<<, ostringstream, basic_ostream:...
#include <stdint.h> // for uint16_t
#include <string> // for basic_string, operator==, string, operator<<
#include <typeinfo> // for type_info
using namespace gsl;
2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
2019-12-19 17:05:02 -05:00
namespace
{
static constexpr char deathstring[] = "Expected Death";
2019-12-20 16:32:14 -05:00
} //namespace
struct MyBase
{
};
struct MyDerived : public MyBase
{
};
struct Unrelated
{
};
2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
// stand-in for a user-defined ref-counted class
template <typename T>
2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
struct RefCounted
{
RefCounted(T* p) : p_(p) {}
operator T*() { return p_; }
T* p_;
};
// user defined smart pointer with comparison operators returning non bool value
template <typename T>
struct CustomPtr
{
CustomPtr(T* p) : p_(p) {}
operator T*() { return p_; }
bool operator!=(std::nullptr_t) const { return p_ != nullptr; }
T* p_ = nullptr;
};
template <typename T, typename U>
std::string operator==(CustomPtr<T> const& lhs, CustomPtr<U> const& rhs)
{
GSL_SUPPRESS(type.1) // NO-FORMAT: attribute
return reinterpret_cast<const void*>(lhs.p_) == reinterpret_cast<const void*>(rhs.p_) ? "true"
: "false";
}
template <typename T, typename U>
std::string operator!=(CustomPtr<T> const& lhs, CustomPtr<U> const& rhs)
{
GSL_SUPPRESS(type.1) // NO-FORMAT: attribute
return reinterpret_cast<const void*>(lhs.p_) != reinterpret_cast<const void*>(rhs.p_) ? "true"
: "false";
}
template <typename T, typename U>
std::string operator<(CustomPtr<T> const& lhs, CustomPtr<U> const& rhs)
{
GSL_SUPPRESS(type.1) // NO-FORMAT: attribute
return reinterpret_cast<const void*>(lhs.p_) < reinterpret_cast<const void*>(rhs.p_) ? "true"
: "false";
}
template <typename T, typename U>
std::string operator>(CustomPtr<T> const& lhs, CustomPtr<U> const& rhs)
{
GSL_SUPPRESS(type.1) // NO-FORMAT: attribute
return reinterpret_cast<const void*>(lhs.p_) > reinterpret_cast<const void*>(rhs.p_) ? "true"
: "false";
}
template <typename T, typename U>
std::string operator<=(CustomPtr<T> const& lhs, CustomPtr<U> const& rhs)
{
GSL_SUPPRESS(type.1) // NO-FORMAT: attribute
return reinterpret_cast<const void*>(lhs.p_) <= reinterpret_cast<const void*>(rhs.p_) ? "true"
: "false";
}
template <typename T, typename U>
std::string operator>=(CustomPtr<T> const& lhs, CustomPtr<U> const& rhs)
{
GSL_SUPPRESS(type.1) // NO-FORMAT: attribute
return reinterpret_cast<const void*>(lhs.p_) >= reinterpret_cast<const void*>(rhs.p_) ? "true"
: "false";
}
struct NonCopyableNonMovable
{
NonCopyableNonMovable() = default;
NonCopyableNonMovable(const NonCopyableNonMovable&) = delete;
NonCopyableNonMovable& operator=(const NonCopyableNonMovable&) = delete;
NonCopyableNonMovable(NonCopyableNonMovable&&) = delete;
NonCopyableNonMovable& operator=(NonCopyableNonMovable&&) = delete;
};
GSL_SUPPRESS(f.4) // NO-FORMAT: attribute
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
bool helper(not_null<int*> p) { return *p == 12; }
GSL_SUPPRESS(f.4) // NO-FORMAT: attribute
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
bool helper_const(not_null<const int*> p) { return *p == 12; }
int* return_pointer() { return nullptr; }
2019-12-03 17:32:25 -05:00
TEST(notnull_tests, TestNotNullConstructors)
2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
{
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
{
2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
#ifdef CONFIRM_COMPILATION_ERRORS
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
not_null<int*> p = nullptr; // yay...does not compile!
not_null<std::vector<char>*> p1 = 0; // yay...does not compile!
not_null<int*> p2; // yay...does not compile!
std::unique_ptr<int> up = std::make_unique<int>(120);
not_null<int*> p3 = up;
// Forbid non-nullptr assignable types
not_null<std::vector<int>> f(std::vector<int>{1});
not_null<int> z(10);
not_null<std::vector<int>> y({1, 2});
2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
#endif
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
}
std::set_terminate([] {
std::cerr << "Expected Death. TestNotNullConstructors";
std::abort();
});
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
{
// from shared pointer
int i = 12;
auto rp = RefCounted<int>(&i);
not_null<int*> p(rp);
EXPECT_TRUE(p.get() == &i);
2018-02-12 12:31:09 -05:00
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
not_null<std::shared_ptr<int>> x(
std::make_shared<int>(10)); // shared_ptr<int> is nullptr assignable
int* pi = nullptr;
EXPECT_DEATH((not_null<decltype(pi)>(pi)), deathstring);
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
}
{
// from pointer to local
int t = 42;
not_null<int*> x = &t;
helper(&t);
helper_const(&t);
EXPECT_TRUE(*x == 42);
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
}
{
// from raw pointer
// from not_null pointer
int t = 42;
int* p = &t;
not_null<int*> x = p;
helper(p);
helper_const(p);
helper(x);
helper_const(x);
EXPECT_TRUE(*x == 42);
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
}
{
// from raw const pointer
// from not_null const pointer
int t = 42;
const int* cp = &t;
not_null<const int*> x = cp;
helper_const(cp);
helper_const(x);
EXPECT_TRUE(*x == 42);
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
}
{
// from not_null const pointer, using auto
int t = 42;
const int* cp = &t;
auto x = not_null<const int*>{cp};
EXPECT_TRUE(*x == 42);
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
}
{
// from returned pointer
EXPECT_DEATH(helper(return_pointer()), deathstring);
EXPECT_DEATH(helper_const(return_pointer()), deathstring);
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
}
}
2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
Dev/annagrin/remove explicit not null constructor (#743) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * Removed explicit not_null constructor, sloppy_not_null, added strict_not_null We added explicit not_null constructor in version 2.0.0. It proved very difficult to switch to the new version for large code bases that adopted previous versions of gsl, due to not_null used extensively in the code. Still, using explicit constructor is very benefitial for new code, since it encorages better API design and make null checks intentional. To resolve the issue, this change: - removes explicit keyword from not_null constructor - removes unneded sloppy_not_null type - adds strict_not_null type to behave the same way as v2 not_null - updates tests * fixed build break for gcc7 * added more tests * added more non-compiling tests * Addressed PR comments and suppressed a code analysis warning * Fixed test failure in not_null tests
2019-01-14 19:45:47 -05:00
template <typename T>
void ostream_helper(T v)
{
not_null<T*> p(&v);
{
std::ostringstream os;
std::ostringstream ref;
os << static_cast<void*>(p);
ref << static_cast<void*>(&v);
EXPECT_TRUE(os.str() == ref.str());
}
{
std::ostringstream os;
std::ostringstream ref;
os << *p;
ref << v;
EXPECT_TRUE(os.str() == ref.str());
}
}
2019-12-03 17:32:25 -05:00
TEST(notnull_tests, TestNotNullostream)
{
ostream_helper<int>(17);
ostream_helper<float>(21.5f);
Clang cl (#762) * Added c++17 test configurations for clang5.0 and clang6.0 * Fix #739 correct cppcorecheck warnings for clang-cl * Add clang-cl configurations * Corrections Appveyor; Temporarily disable msvc compilation for faster testing (#741) * Add path to clang-cl.exe (#741) * Escape backslash in path (#741) * Update vcpkg (#741) * Check vcpkg version; try without building vcpkg; use latest clang-cl from path (#741) * Fix blocks in ps script (#741) * Try accessing APPVEYOR_BUILD_FOLDER variable (#471) * Update span size() bug confirmation test for GCC 6.5 (#741) * MSVC flags to Clang-cl; disable c++98-compat and undefined macro warnings (#741) * Suppress clang warning on tests (missing-prototypes) (#741) * Fix clang warning -Wnewline-eof (#741) * Fix clang warning -Wdouble-promotion (#741) * Set linker explicitly * Clean condition statement * For Clang, fallback to the AppVeyor installed version of CMake * Fix clang warning -Wmissing-variable-declarations * Fallback to the MSVC linker until vcpkg has been updated * Revert "Fallback to the MSVC linker until vcpkg has been updated" This reverts commit 7263f3289e6e835c32fc7800d0c2d4e58bd21178. * Fix clang warning -Wunused-member-function * Fix clang warning -Wmissing-noreturn * Fix clang warning -Winvalid-noreturn on Windows * Add macro block end comment on large #if blocks * Workaround: fallback to mscv link.exe * Workaround: get msvc paths into PowerShell through intermediate file * Workaround: fix, remove "PATH=" from text * Workaround: try with full-path; and return user PATH * Workaround: fix, escape backslashes * Revert all since "Workaround: fallback to mscv link.exe" did not work on AppVeyor This reverts the commits: bda3d6a428e5d19e97375b2e575b0f51ff1b4bc0 97062933acfb6428535c0fdcab5d94371ce72bfc 0f4fb04bac9c2d091005b791294237250dbe0668 1b0c19afd154f4ffc5ef793014c1bc2324534fd0 a5739ea5f0cd7633527b5e5d3b16a9e3ade7149f * Suppress output of git pull; remove vcpkg from cache * Re-enable AppVeyor builds for all platforms * Correct typo Co-Authored-By: Farwaykorse <Farwaykorse@users.noreply.github.com> * Add Clang-cl 7.0.0 to the supported platforms * Revert "Fix clang warning -Wunused-member-function" This reverts commit 6fe1a4203501145ab4350b9152ecc11f3a30e49a. * Fix or locally suppress clang warning -Wunused-member-function * format touched code and correct comment * git pull --quiet * fix logic error in workaround * fix missing bracket * Suppress output of mkdir * Replace MSBuild with Ninja * Suppress output of 7z * Add architecture flags for Clang * Drop workaround for lld-link * 7-zip Overwrite and Alternative output suppression without suppressing errors Replaces 3c1c0794dd9a29908cc7c38f591bd3c7b4929677 * AppVeyor setup and CMake before build * reorder compiler configuration * remove unnecessary * remove -fno-strict-aliasing * remove -Wsign-conversion, since before v4.0 part of -Wconversion * -Wctor-dtor-privacy is GCC only * remove -Woverloaded-virtual part of -Wmost, part of -Wall * add -Wmissing-noreturn * remove the pragmas for -Wunused-member-function * Re-add MSBuild generator on AppVeyor * Print CMake commands * Add MSBuild toolset selection * Separate Architecture setting * clang-cl: add -Weverything * clang-cl -Wno-c++98-compat * clang-cl -Wno-c++98-compat-pedantic * clang-cl -Wno-missing-prototypes * clang-cl C++14 -Wno-unused-member-function * clang-cl -Wundef __GNUC__ * clang++: add -Weverything * clang++ -Wno-c++98-compat * clang++ -Wno-c++98-compat-pedantic * clang++ -Wno-missing-prototypes * clang++ -Wno-weak-vtables * clang++ C++14 -Wno-unused-member-function * clang++ fix -Wundef _MSC_VER * clang++ -Wno-padded * clang++ solve -Wdeprecated * Add AppleClang compiler target Since CMake v3.0 use of Clang for both is deprecated * clang++ v5.0 C++17 -Wno-undefined-func-template * Add VS2015 + LLVM/clang-cl to AppVeyor * Do not disable constexpr when compiling with clang-cl on Windows * Clean-up clang-only warnings (now under -Weverything) * Revert "Fix clang warning -Winvalid-noreturn on Windows" This reverts commit 2238c4760e86feebb2a18620b77312bd01055f61. * Suppress -Winvalid-noreturn for the MS STL noexception workaround * CMake: put preprocessor definition in target_compile_definitions * Solve compiler warning C4668: __GNUC__ not defined
2019-01-15 13:27:34 -05:00
ostream_helper<double>(3.4566e-7);
ostream_helper<char>('c');
ostream_helper<uint16_t>(0x0123u);
ostream_helper<const char*>("cstring");
ostream_helper<std::string>("string");
}
2019-12-03 17:32:25 -05:00
TEST(notnull_tests, TestNotNullCasting)
{
MyBase base;
MyDerived derived;
Unrelated unrelated;
not_null<Unrelated*> u{&unrelated};
(void) u;
not_null<MyDerived*> p{&derived};
not_null<MyBase*> q(&base);
q = p; // allowed with heterogeneous copy ctor
EXPECT_TRUE(q == p);
2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
#ifdef CONFIRM_COMPILATION_ERRORS
q = u; // no viable conversion possible between MyBase* and Unrelated*
p = q; // not possible to implicitly convert MyBase* to MyDerived*
not_null<Unrelated*> r = p;
not_null<Unrelated*> s = reinterpret_cast<Unrelated*>(p);
2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
#endif
not_null<Unrelated*> t(reinterpret_cast<Unrelated*>(p.get()));
EXPECT_TRUE(reinterpret_cast<void*>(p.get()) == reinterpret_cast<void*>(t.get()));
}
2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
2019-12-03 17:32:25 -05:00
TEST(notnull_tests, TestNotNullAssignment)
{
std::set_terminate([] {
std::cerr << "Expected Death. TestNotNullAssignmentd";
std::abort();
});
int i = 12;
not_null<int*> p(&i);
2019-12-03 17:32:25 -05:00
EXPECT_TRUE(helper(p));
2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
int* q = nullptr;
EXPECT_DEATH(p = not_null<int*>(q), deathstring);
}
2019-12-03 17:32:25 -05:00
TEST(notnull_tests, TestNotNullRawPointerComparison)
{
int ints[2] = {42, 43};
int* p1 = &ints[0];
const int* p2 = &ints[1];
using NotNull1 = not_null<decltype(p1)>;
using NotNull2 = not_null<decltype(p2)>;
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) == NotNull1(p1)) == true);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) == NotNull2(p2)) == false);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) != NotNull1(p1)) == false);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) != NotNull2(p2)) == true);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) < NotNull1(p1)) == false);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) < NotNull2(p2)) == (p1 < p2));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull2(p2) < NotNull1(p1)) == (p2 < p1));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) > NotNull1(p1)) == false);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) > NotNull2(p2)) == (p1 > p2));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull2(p2) > NotNull1(p1)) == (p2 > p1));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) <= NotNull1(p1)) == true);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) <= NotNull2(p2)) == (p1 <= p2));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull2(p2) <= NotNull1(p1)) == (p2 <= p1));
}
2019-12-03 17:32:25 -05:00
TEST(notnull_tests, TestNotNullDereferenceOperator)
{
{
auto sp1 = std::make_shared<NonCopyableNonMovable>();
using NotNullSp1 = not_null<decltype(sp1)>;
EXPECT_TRUE(typeid(*sp1) == typeid(*NotNullSp1(sp1)));
EXPECT_TRUE(std::addressof(*NotNullSp1(sp1)) == std::addressof(*sp1));
}
{
int ints[1] = {42};
CustomPtr<int> p1(&ints[0]);
using NotNull1 = not_null<decltype(p1)>;
EXPECT_TRUE(typeid(*NotNull1(p1)) == typeid(*p1));
EXPECT_TRUE(*NotNull1(p1) == 42);
*NotNull1(p1) = 43;
EXPECT_TRUE(ints[0] == 43);
}
{
int v = 42;
gsl::not_null<int*> p(&v);
EXPECT_TRUE(typeid(*p) == typeid(*(&v)));
*p = 43;
EXPECT_TRUE(v == 43);
}
}
2019-12-03 17:32:25 -05:00
TEST(notnull_tests, TestNotNullSharedPtrComparison)
{
auto sp1 = std::make_shared<int>(42);
auto sp2 = std::make_shared<const int>(43);
using NotNullSp1 = not_null<decltype(sp1)>;
using NotNullSp2 = not_null<decltype(sp2)>;
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp1(sp1) == NotNullSp1(sp1)) == true);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp1(sp1) == NotNullSp2(sp2)) == false);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp1(sp1) != NotNullSp1(sp1)) == false);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp1(sp1) != NotNullSp2(sp2)) == true);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp1(sp1) < NotNullSp1(sp1)) == false);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp1(sp1) < NotNullSp2(sp2)) == (sp1 < sp2));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp2(sp2) < NotNullSp1(sp1)) == (sp2 < sp1));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp1(sp1) > NotNullSp1(sp1)) == false);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp1(sp1) > NotNullSp2(sp2)) == (sp1 > sp2));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp2(sp2) > NotNullSp1(sp1)) == (sp2 > sp1));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp1(sp1) <= NotNullSp1(sp1)) == true);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp1(sp1) <= NotNullSp2(sp2)) == (sp1 <= sp2));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp2(sp2) <= NotNullSp1(sp1)) == (sp2 <= sp1));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp1(sp1) >= NotNullSp1(sp1)) == true);
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp1(sp1) >= NotNullSp2(sp2)) == (sp1 >= sp2));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNullSp2(sp2) >= NotNullSp1(sp1)) == (sp2 >= sp1));
}
2019-12-03 17:32:25 -05:00
TEST(notnull_tests, TestNotNullCustomPtrComparison)
{
int ints[2] = {42, 43};
CustomPtr<int> p1(&ints[0]);
CustomPtr<const int> p2(&ints[1]);
using NotNull1 = not_null<decltype(p1)>;
using NotNull2 = not_null<decltype(p2)>;
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) == NotNull1(p1)) == "true");
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) == NotNull2(p2)) == "false");
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) != NotNull1(p1)) == "false");
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) != NotNull2(p2)) == "true");
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) < NotNull1(p1)) == "false");
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) < NotNull2(p2)) == (p1 < p2));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull2(p2) < NotNull1(p1)) == (p2 < p1));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) > NotNull1(p1)) == "false");
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) > NotNull2(p2)) == (p1 > p2));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull2(p2) > NotNull1(p1)) == (p2 > p1));
2015-08-20 21:09:14 -04:00
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) <= NotNull1(p1)) == "true");
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) <= NotNull2(p2)) == (p1 <= p2));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull2(p2) <= NotNull1(p1)) == (p2 <= p1));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) >= NotNull1(p1)) == "true");
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull1(p1) >= NotNull2(p2)) == (p1 >= p2));
EXPECT_TRUE((NotNull2(p2) >= NotNull1(p1)) == (p2 >= p1));
}
#if defined(__cplusplus) && (__cplusplus >= 201703L)
2019-12-03 17:32:25 -05:00
TEST(notnull_tests, TestNotNullConstructorTypeDeduction)
{
{
int i = 42;
not_null x{&i};
helper(not_null{&i});
helper_const(not_null{&i});
EXPECT_TRUE(*x == 42);
}
{
int i = 42;
int* p = &i;
not_null x{p};
helper(not_null{p});
helper_const(not_null{p});
EXPECT_TRUE(*x == 42);
}
2019-12-12 19:48:59 -05:00
std::set_terminate([] {
std::cerr << "Expected Death. TestNotNullConstructorTypeDeduction";
std::abort();
});
{
auto workaround_macro = []() {
int* p1 = nullptr;
const not_null x{p1};
};
EXPECT_DEATH(workaround_macro(), deathstring);
}
{
auto workaround_macro = []() {
const int* p1 = nullptr;
const not_null x{p1};
};
EXPECT_DEATH(workaround_macro(), deathstring);
}
{
int* p = nullptr;
EXPECT_DEATH(helper(not_null{p}), deathstring);
EXPECT_DEATH(helper_const(not_null{p}), deathstring);
}
#ifdef CONFIRM_COMPILATION_ERRORS
{
not_null x{nullptr};
helper(not_null{nullptr});
helper_const(not_null{nullptr});
}
#endif
}
#endif // #if defined(__cplusplus) && (__cplusplus >= 201703L)
2019-12-03 17:32:25 -05:00
TEST(notnull_tests, TestMakeNotNull)
{
{
int i = 42;
const auto x = make_not_null(&i);
helper(make_not_null(&i));
helper_const(make_not_null(&i));
EXPECT_TRUE(*x == 42);
}
{
int i = 42;
int* p = &i;
const auto x = make_not_null(p);
helper(make_not_null(p));
helper_const(make_not_null(p));
EXPECT_TRUE(*x == 42);
}
std::set_terminate([] {
std::cerr << "Expected Death. TestMakeNotNull";
std::abort();
});
{
const auto workaround_macro = []() {
int* p1 = nullptr;
const auto x = make_not_null(p1);
EXPECT_TRUE(*x == 42);
};
EXPECT_DEATH(workaround_macro(), deathstring);
}
{
const auto workaround_macro = []() {
const int* p1 = nullptr;
const auto x = make_not_null(p1);
EXPECT_TRUE(*x == 42);
};
EXPECT_DEATH(workaround_macro(), deathstring);
}
{
int* p = nullptr;
EXPECT_DEATH(helper(make_not_null(p)), deathstring);
EXPECT_DEATH(helper_const(make_not_null(p)), deathstring);
}
#ifdef CONFIRM_COMPILATION_ERRORS
{
EXPECT_DEATH(make_not_null(nullptr), deathstring);
EXPECT_DEATH(helper(make_not_null(nullptr)), deathstring);
EXPECT_DEATH(helper_const(make_not_null(nullptr)), deathstring);
}
#endif
}
TEST(notnull_tests, TestStdHash)
{
int x = 42;
int y = 99;
not_null<int*> nn{&x};
const not_null<int*> cnn{&x};
std::hash<not_null<int*>> hash_nn;
std::hash<int*> hash_intptr;
EXPECT_TRUE(hash_nn(nn) == hash_intptr(&x));
EXPECT_FALSE(hash_nn(nn) == hash_intptr(&y));
EXPECT_FALSE(hash_nn(nn) == hash_intptr(nullptr));
}